The Blunt Rating System (finally)

I love blunts. Although I am not a "stoner," perhaps, I do love to smoke a nice L.  All of my friends, whether back home, or in the frat here, also love to smoke blunts.  There is a sense of pride in rolling the perfect blunt.  The blunt that everybody passes around and says "wow" about.  You know that everybody who rolls even okay blunts, think that they roll they roll the best ones.  Up until I came across my high idea about rating blunts, there was really no final judgment on whose L's are rolled the nicest.  Even if others agree that your blunt was better than others, somebody is left with the false hope that they, in reality, can out roll anybody.  Lets face it, you created it, its like your child!  or maybe not? who knows!?

         Anyway, here's my system of rating a blunt (foolproof):
 The system consists of either two, or four judges, depending on the size of the blunt and how high the judges are willing to get. (lets say that we are using a "dub," ($20 bag (gram?))) w.e you want to call it)

-Roller A and Roller B both roll up blunts; Blunt A and Blunt B.
-the 4 judges spark up the two blunts (rollers can be judges if they are not biased assholes) 

-each judge gets a piece of paper and a pen
-after each hit of the blunt the judge who took the hit rates it from 1-10 depending on the quality of the hit
-after the blunt is done all of the numbers from each hit get added together
-Blunt with the highest score wins (no arguing!)